Skip to main content
Pattern Insights is an administrator-only surface. It runs six statistical detectors over your school’s goal-completion data and surfaces patterns that a manual review would likely miss. Supervisors do not have access to this page; the underlying action returns “Unauthorized” for any role other than administrator. Insights are not generated every time you open the page. An administrator clicks Generate Insights (this requires an active subscription) to run all six detectors and replace the organization’s current set of non-dismissed insights. Zion also regenerates them automatically every week. Each insight expires 7 days after it is generated, gets a relevance score from 0 to 100, and is labeled with a confidence level of high, medium, or low based on how much data backed the detection.
Pattern insights list showing detected trends and confidence levels

Detected pattern insights with confidence levels and trend direction.


Day-of-week patterns

What it analyzes

Goal achievement variation across the days of the week.

Detection method

A day of the week needs at least 10 goals recorded on that day to be considered. The detector compares that day’s average achievement rate to the weekly average and flags the day if the variance exceeds 10 percentage points.

Example insights

Low-performance day: “Goal achievement is 18% lower on Fridays compared to the weekly average of 82%.” High-performance day: “Students perform 12% better on Tuesdays, the strongest day of the week.”

Confidence requirements

What to do

For low days:
  • Investigate day-specific factors such as Monday transitions or Friday fatigue
  • Consider adjusted goals on the affected day
  • Plan more engaging activities for that day
For high days:
  • Document what makes the day successful
  • Consider applying the same conditions to other days

Subject correlations

What it analyzes

Relationships between a student’s performance in different subjects.

Detection method

The detector requires at least 5 goals per subject per student and at least 15 students with data in both subjects being compared. It calculates the Pearson correlation coefficient between subject pairs and flags any pair where the correlation magnitude exceeds 0.7. A magnitude above 0.85 is labeled “very strong”; between 0.7 and 0.85 is labeled “strong.”

Example insights

Shared struggle pattern: “Students struggling in Math 1042-1048 are also struggling in Science 1040-1045 (correlation: 0.78).” Shared challenge: “English and Social Studies show a strong correlation (0.82). Students struggling in one typically struggle in both.”

Confidence requirements

What to do

  • Investigate shared prerequisite gaps between the two subjects
  • Consider paired tutoring or combined support sessions
  • Review whether the subjects share foundational skills

Centre performance

What it analyzes

How each learning centre compares to the school-wide average.

Detection method

The detector requires at least 20 goals per centre and at least 2 centres with valid data. It compares each centre’s achievement rate to the school-wide average and flags a centre if it differs by more than 15 percentage points.

Example insights

Underperforming centre: “Learning Centre B is performing 22% below the school average (58% vs 80%).” High-performing centre: “Learning Centre A is 15% above average, the top performer at 95%.”

Confidence requirements

What to do

For underperforming centres:
  • Investigate environmental factors and supervisor practices
  • Consider resource reallocation or targeted support
  • Check the corresponding centre_low_performance alert for the same signal
For high-performing centres:
  • Document the practices in place
  • Share the approach with other centres

What it analyzes

Change in achievement rate between the first and second half of the current term.

Detection method

The term must be at least 6 weeks in, with at least 50 total goals recorded and at least 25 goals in each half. The detector compares the achievement rate in the first half of the term to the second half and flags a change greater than 15%.

Example insights

Declining performance: “Achievement has dropped 18% in the second half of this term (72%, down from 90%).” Improving performance: “Performance improved 22% in the term’s second half, a strong positive trend.”

Confidence requirements

What to do

For declining trends:
  • Review workload distribution and address term fatigue
  • Consider mid-term breaks or added engagement activities
For improving trends:
  • Document what changed and maintain it
  • Recognize the progress with students and staff

Student velocity

What it analyzes

Individual students whose achievement rate is accelerating or decelerating.

Detection method

A student needs at least 20 total goals across an 8-week window, with at least 5 goals in each 4-week half, to be evaluated. The detector compares the first 4 weeks to the last 4 weeks and marks a student as accelerating or decelerating if the change exceeds 25%. An org-level insight only fires if more than 20% of eligible students are accelerating, or more than 20% are decelerating.

Example insights

Accelerating students: “8 students have improved their achievement rate by >30% in the last 4 weeks.” Decelerating students: “5 students have shown a >25% decline in recent weeks. Intervention needed.”

What to do

For accelerating students:
  • Note what changed for them and reinforce it
  • Consider peer mentor roles where appropriate
For decelerating students:
  • Investigate the cause and schedule a student or parent meeting
  • Set up an intervention plan and monitor closely

Subject difficulty

What it analyzes

PACEs with a completion rate below the expected range.

Detection method

A PACE needs at least 10 attempts to be evaluated. The detector flags any PACE with a completion rate below 70%.

Example insights

Difficult PACE: “Math 1048 has a 58% completion rate, well below the 85% expected.”

Confidence requirements

What to do

  • Review the PACE content for complexity and prerequisite coverage
  • Provide additional support resources for that PACE
  • Discuss the pattern with curriculum specialists

Comparing insight types

Working with insights

1

Generate or refresh

Click Generate Insights to run all six detectors against current data. This requires an active subscription and replaces the current set of non-dismissed insights.
2

Filter

Filter the list by confidence (all, high, medium, low) or by type (weekly pattern, subject correlation, centre performance, seasonal trend, student velocity, subject difficulty).
3

Drill into an insight

Click a card to open the insight detail drawer, which lists the specific students or centres affected by that pattern.
4

Dismiss or export

Dismiss an insight to remove it from the active list, or export a PDF of the full report or a single insight.
Insights expire 7 days after generation. Regenerate them to keep the list current, or rely on the weekly automatic refresh.

Insights overview

Introduction to the insights system

Administrator insights guide

Turning insights into interventions

Analytics dashboard

Trends, subject and centre breakdowns, and predictions

Predictions

Per-student termly goal projections